Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05329
Original file (BC 2012 05329.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05329
	XXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill educational 
benefits to his spouse.

________________________________________________________________

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

When he was being medically retired, he filled out the paperwork 
to convert over to the Post 9/11 GI Bill and to transfer all 
36 months to his spouse.  In Nov 12, he logged into the website 
to transfer his benefits and noticed that the transfer never 
took place.  He is not sure if the error was due to his medical 
retirement and years of service.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 23 Sep 10, the applicant was relieved from active duty, with 
a reason for separation of disability permanent.  He retired on 
24 Sep 10 after serving 9 years, 9 months, and 12 days on active 
duty.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial.  DPSIT notes that the applicant 
did not provide adequate justification/documentation of an error 
or injustice.  His record reflect that he received his pre-
separation counseling on 12 Jul 10.

The applicant indicated on his DD Form 2648, Pre-separation 
Counseling Checklist for Active Component Service Members, that 
he did want counseling for educational benefits prior to his 
retirement.  However, there is no record of the applicant 
applying for the benefit in the Transfer of Education Benefits 
(TEB) system.  He did not inquire about their TEB until 13 Nov 
12 to the Total Force Service Center through Right Now 
Technology (RNT).

The complete DPSIT evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Upon finding out that he was going to be medically retired, he 
had a lot of decisions and sacrifices that he needed to make.  
He had every attention to remain on active duty and retire at 
20 plus years; however, due to an unfortunate injury while on 
duty, his career was cut short.   

On his DD Form 2648, he had requested counseling on his 
education benefits and had every intention of filling out the 
appropriate paperwork needed to transfer his benefits to his 
spouse.  He thought he had taken care of this requirement; 
however, when he logged into the GI Bill website, he realized 
that he had failed to complete the necessary paperwork, which he 
feels was due to all of the confusion with retirement and 
finding a new job to take care of his family.

The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, the applicant has not provided sufficient 
evidence that he did not receive the appropriate counseling as 
required by law and Department of Defense regulations.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-05329 in Executive Session on 12 Sep 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 Nov 12, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 19 Nov 12.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Dec 12.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 2 Jan 13.




                                   Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05383

    Original file (BC 2013 05383.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouses or children. THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02355

    Original file (BC-2012-02355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02355 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03405

    Original file (BC 2014 03405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DVA counselor did not mention anything about ensuring he transferred months to his dependents prior to retirement. It stated ‘upon approval, family members may apply to use transferred benefits with the DVA by completing a DVA Form 22-1990e.” But there was no mention that it had to be done before retirement. While the applicant’s review states the 18 Jul 09 DVA letter is confusing on what needed to be done and does not mention the TEB application had to be completed before retirement,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01985

    Original file (BC-2012-01985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not counseled on the requirements to transfer at least one month of education benefits to each dependent prior to his retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04771

    Original file (BC 2013 04771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). If you do not receive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05040

    Original file (BC-2012-05040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the applicant retired from active duty prior to the Tranfer of Benefits becoming effective on 1 Aug 09 and, other than argument and conjecture, he has presented no evidence to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00542

    Original file (BC-2013-00542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00542 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) to request Transfer of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05922

    Original file (BC 2012 05922.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05922 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents. Although, the OPR does not feel he exercised reasonable diligence in making a timely decision before he separated from active duty, based on the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02291

    Original file (BC-2011-02291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02291 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. A1PA reviewed the DMDC’s TEB database that confirmed the applicant did not apply to transfer his benefits before his 1 Dec 10 retirement. To date, a response has not been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01017

    Original file (BC-2012-01017.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. On 28 Jan 11, the applicant received pre-separation counseling and indicated on his DD Form 2648, Pre-separation Counseling Checklist for Active Component (AC) Service Members that he wanted counseling for educational benefits prior to his retirement. ...